W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: minor typos in CR-UAAG10-20000128

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 10:31:30 -0500
Message-ID: <38BA94D2.AFCC997F@w3.org>
To: Susan Lesch <susan@textet.com>
CC: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Susan Lesch wrote:
> 
> These are a few ideas for very minor typographical improvements to
> your User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 [1] Candidate
> Recommendation ("work in progress"). If they come too late, or are of
> no use to you, please ignore them. Comments on the Techniques
> Document are on their way separately.

Thank you Susan,

All the changes will be incorporated into the next revision.

 - Ian
 
> There are about six or seven references to HTML 4.0 that could be
> changed to HTML 4.01 or HTML 4.
> 
>  From here on, items are identified by section and paragraph or list
> item number. A quote follows, and then an idea for improvement.
> Comments are in brackets [].
> 
> 1.2 Ensure that the user interface is accessible - par. 1 and par. 3
> the the [twice]
> the
> 
> 1.2 Ensure that the user interface is accessible - par. 3 item 1
> (e.g,.
> (e.g.,
> 
> 1.2 Help orient the user - list item 1
> etc.,
> etc.
> 
> 1.7 Validity of a claim - par. 3
> Claimants are expected modify or retract
> Claimants are expected to modify or retract
> 
> 1.7 Checkpoint applicability - second to last item
> (e.g,.
> (e.g.,
> 
> 2. Guideline 2 - par. 2
> "...User agents should allow users to specify whether primary
>      content should be rendered, equivalent alternatives, or both."
> [Not sure here but this could read something like:]
>      User agents should allow users to specify whether primary
>      content should be rendered, output as an equivalent alternative,
>      or both.
> 
> 2. Guideline 5 - list item 5
> audio cues (users
> audio cues (for users
> 
> 3. Glossary - Recognize
> etc
> etc.
> 
> 3. Glossary - Rendered content
> c.f.
> cf.
> 
> Checklists:
> 
> In the Checklists [2,3], in the opening section for "This version,"
> "postscript" could read "PostScript" and "pdf" could read "PDF".
> 
> There is one outdated reference to HTML 4.0 in the last Priority 2
> checkpoint. This could be changed to HTML 4.01 or HTML 4.
> 
> References:
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-UAAG10-20000128/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-UAAG10-20000128/uaag10-chktable
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-UAAG10-20000128/uaag10-chklist.html
> 
> Thanks for your time, and best wishes for your project,
> --
> Susan Lesch
> susan@textet.com

-- 
Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel/Fax:                     +1 212 684-1814 or 212 532-4767
Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783
Received on Monday, 28 February 2000 10:31:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:49:52 GMT