W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2000

RE: notes on at interaction with uas

From: Denis Anson <danson@miseri.edu>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 11:27:15 -0500
To: "David Poehlman" <poehlman@clark.net>, "User Agent Working group list" <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Message-ID: <GEEALOAPINMEBKLJPLPJMEMKCCAA.danson@miseri.edu>
David,

I like the idea of equivalence, and I think that it is definable by a
"reasonable person."  (Microsecond differences don't matter, productivity
does.)

Denis

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org]On Behalf
Of David Poehlman
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 9:41 AM
To: User Agent Working group list
Subject: notes on at interaction with uas

I wrote these yesterday but wanted to make sure to review the minutes
before posting to avoide possible redundancy.
1>  splitting dynamic and static may result in half inplementation.
even though it might be considered that static be p2, a case can be
made for it being p1.  I cannot make that case as well as perhaps gg
or hans might or another at developer. Rich may be able to help with
this too.  They are often one entity.
2> I got it from gg finally that we have two concerns.  one is getting
the process in the same manner and at the same <time> as the ua and
the other is being able to perform manipulations on the document and
provide timely rendering in at.


I think it can then be expressed this way in a checkpoint or almost
this way:
Provide ats with the ability to access and manipulate the document at
the same performance level as that for the ua.

Thoughts?

--
Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
ftp://ftp.clark.net/pub/poehlman
http://poehlman.clark.net
mailto:poehlman@clark.net
voice 301-949-7599
end sig.
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2000 11:25:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:49:52 GMT