schwer@us.ibm.com wrote: > > Ian, > > A while back we were discussing navigation of tables and there was > considerable discussion of the priority of this as well as how to do it. I > understood (perhaps incorrectly) that this was moved under structured > navigation. > > Is this correct? Yes. Issue 160 resolved 10 December in Austin: > Resolved: > Merge 7.3 into 7.7 as P2 (since content available per 2.1). > Mention tables explicitly in 7.7. > Leave 8.1 as P1. Add note about DOM. Ensure sufficient > information for ATs to get contextual information for the table. http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/1999/12/ftf-19991210#issue-160 > If so, what was the priority and wording of this checkpoint? > The December 20 guidelines would not reflect this. From the 20 Dec guidelines, Guideline 8 [1]: > 7.6 Allow the user to navigate according to structure. [Priority 2] > For example, allow the user to navigate familiar elements > of a document: paragraphs, tables and table cells, headers, ... There's no (longer a) checkpoint about table navigation in the 20 December Guidelines. _ Ian [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/WAI-USERAGENT/#gl-navigation -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel/Fax: +1 212 684-1814 Cell: +1 917 450-8783Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2000 08:20:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:49:51 GMT