W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > January to March 2000

Re: Editorial: Checkpoint 2.5

From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:02:45 -0600
Message-Id: <4.1.20000111090108.00f7c3b0@staff.uiuc.edu>
To: Harvey Bingham <hbingham@ACM.org>, User Agent Guidelines Emailing List <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
It means one option is basically to turn the rendering of alternatives off.
 It saves using having a checkpoint that just says turn the rendering of an
alternative on and off.
Jon


At 06:38 PM 1/10/00 -0500, Harvey Bingham wrote:
>Checkpoint 2.5 If more than one alternative equivalent is available for 
>content, allow the user to choose from among the alternatives. This 
>includes the choice of viewing no alternatives.
>
>?why "no alternatives"? If that is appropriate, then how does that apply if 
>there are no alternatives to start with? Are you suggesting that the 
>alternative equivalents are such as the attributes alt="..." longdesc="..." 
>or the "d" convention? If so, so state.
>
>Regards/Harvey Bingham

Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
Chair, W3C WAI User Agent Working Group
Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
College of Applied Life Studies
University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL  61820

Voice: (217) 244-5870
Fax: (217) 333-0248

E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu

WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2000 10:04:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:49:51 GMT