W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: Preparation for 27 April teleconference [Was Re: AGENDA: W3C WAI User Agent Telecon 27 April 2000]

From: David Poehlman <poehlman@clark.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:38:27 -0400
Message-ID: <39087B13.1A1E8DC8@clark.net>
CC: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org, w3c-wai-pf@w3.org
Some thoughts.
1> It seems that there are three types of information.  Let's call them
data, instructions and rendered content or something like that.  I think
there should be a way to state that a source view is not sufficient without
saying so if we employ the types of information being discussed
appropriately.  I am not certain as to what the propper positive way is but
know that there is one.  Just taking the sentence:
"a source view is not sufficient." and turning it inside out can yeild:
"the minimum requirement is that which results in all content being rendered
in an intellegible way.
I know.  we have to define intellegible but I have done a lot of reading of
this thread and will follow it to its conclusion and I am at this point now.

If things become clearer for me, I will be happy to make them known.  
Thanks!
-- 
Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
ftp://ftp.clark.net/pub/poehlman
http://poehlman.clark.net
mailto:poehlman@clark.net
voice 301-949-7599
end sig.
Received on Thursday, 27 April 2000 13:38:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:50:03 GMT