W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: Formal Objection to Checkpoint 9.2

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 15:42:34 -0400
Message-ID: <3905F52A.4A3DFA@w3.org>
To: schwer@us.ibm.com
CC: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
schwer@us.ibm.com wrote:
> 
> I would like to register an objection to the resolution of Issue 243. I
> believe that checkpoint 9.2 should be a P3 requirement rather than a P2
> requirement because this is a content authoring problem that effects
> usability. User Agents should not be required to correct poor content as a
> disability requirement. This creates an undue burden on user agents. I do
> not feel this recommendation should go forward with this as a P2
> requirement.

Rich,

If the WG decides to move forward despite this objection, the
Director will be informed of the objection and it will be
weighed as part of the decision to go to Recommendation.

Thank you,

 - Ian

-- 
Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                         +1 831 457-2842
Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2000 15:45:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:50:03 GMT