W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: Proposed definitions for content, document object, etc.

From: Hans Riesebos <HRiesebos@alva-bv.nl>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 11:17:04 +0100
Message-Id: <s8fd95c8.064@mail.alva-bv.nl>
To: <ij@w3.org>
Cc: "<"<w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Some small remarks <Hans>between these tags</Hans>

>>> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> 04/18/00 10:54PM >>>

6) Source view

   <BLOCKQUOTE>
   A source view renders all or part of the document
   object in a way that reveals the document object
   model. Often, a source view presents the document
   object using the syntax of the source markup 
   languages.
   </BLOCKQUOTE>

<Hans>
As I understand, the "source" is unparsed and therefore cannot reveal the document object in any way. Speaking of document object itself is false. If only the source was already parsed (contradiction in terms), a source view might (minimally) satisfy checkpoint 2.1, because in effect it would have become a document object view.
</Hans>

Hans Riesebos
ALVA BV, The Netherlands
HRiesebos@alva-bv.nl
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2000 05:18:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:50:03 GMT