W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: Important: Issues relating to checkpoint 2.1 raised during 30 March teleconference.

From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <unagi69@concentric.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 03:49:10 -0400
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000405034621.00bb9e70@pop3.concentric.net>
To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Cc: User Agent Guidelines Emailing List <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
aloha, jon!

you wrote, quote
One point advocated by gregory is that NOFRAMES content be available 
through the UI and that this should be a requirement for complying with 
Checkpoint 2.1.  Whether we change the wording of checkpoint 2.1 or not 
both the new version of Microsoft Internet Explorer 5 for the Macintosh and 
Opera 3.60 for Windows allow themselves to be configured to render NOFRAMES 
content instead of the frame content.  These examples could be included in 
the techniques document for the checkpoint.
unquote

exposition of NOFRAMES by quote mainstream unquote UAs is already -- at 
least in some circles -- a fait accompli...  does anyone know if Mozilla 
supports exposition of NOFRAMES as an alternative to rendering frames?

gregory.


--------------------------------------------------------
He that lives on Hope, dies farting
      -- Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanack, 1763
--------------------------------------------------------
Gregory J. Rosmaita <unagi69@concentric.net>
    WebMaster and Minister of Propaganda, VICUG NYC
         <http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/vicug/index.html>
--------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 5 April 2000 03:38:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:50:03 GMT