Re: Two more i18n last call comments on User Agent AccessibilityGuidelines 1.0

FYI.

> Resent-Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 08:58:31 -0500 (EST)
> From: keshlam@us.ibm.com
> X-Lotus-FromDomain: IBMUS
> To: w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, w3c-dom-ig@w3.org
> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 08:57:58 -0500
> Resent-From: w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
> Old-X-Mailing-List: <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org> archive/latest/2104
> X-Loop: w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Two more i18n last call comments on User Agent 	 AccessibilityGuidelines 1.0
> X-Mailing-List: <w3c-i18n-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/2600
> X-Loop: w3c-i18n-wg@w3.org
> Sender: w3c-i18n-wg-request@w3.org
> Resent-Sender: w3c-i18n-wg-request@w3.org
> X-UIDL: e53ecb3fda28037a4834e8b93e8c1a2a
> 
> Quoth Ian:
> > Argh. This means no events in DOM2?
> 
> I believe the current plan is that DOM Level 2 includes the event
> propigation model, document mutation events, HTML events, mouse events, and
> some of the user-interface events (resize, scroll).
> 
> The _key_ events, specifically, will not be officially defined in DOM Level
> 2  unless we manage to nail them down completely during the Candidate
> Proposed Recommendation phase. If we aren't completely comfortable with
> them before that deadline, they'll be deferred until they are ready for
> release. Whether that's Level 3, or Level 2.1, will probably depend on how
> critical the W3C as a whole thinks they are, and whether it's worth
> interrupting other working groups with a request that these be reviewed.
> 
> (Quick reminder: Event distribution, and each of the basic event sets
> individually, are optional modules. A DOM can decline to implement them and
> still be compliant with Level 2, as long as it reports this correctly via
> hasFeature.)
> 
> ______________________________________
> Joe Kesselman  / IBM Research
> 
> 
> 
> 


#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, World Wide Web Consortium
#-#-#  mailto:duerst@w3.org   http://www.w3.org

Received on Tuesday, 7 December 1999 23:06:49 UTC