W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > October to December 1999

Re: direct and spatial mapping to functionalities

From: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 1999 02:10:23 -0400
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19991005021023.009c1270@localhost>
To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Cc: thatch@us.ibm.com, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
At 11:55 AM 10/4/99 -0400, Ian Jacobs wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>We seem to have several threads going here. Please let
>me know if I've understood the issues:
>
>1) User agents must support the standard keyboard API because
>   ATs today work via the keyboard API. Therefore, we have
>   a Guideline today to ensure access through the keyboard
>   API to all functionalities. Mouse keys uses the mouse API
>   and therefore support for mouse keys would not satisfy
>   checkpoint 2.1 of the 4 October draft.

To me keyboard API means you get keyboard key codes, mouse API you get
pointing, and mousekey codes. From those the UA does the mapping to the
functionalities i.e you can get an arrow key code (keyboard API) or even
codes for L, R, U, and D keys (left, right, up, down) and use them for
pointing. And I don't think I'm using mouse API at all here, but correct if
I'm wrong.

>
>2) Users need two types of access to user agent functionalities:
>   serial (with context) and direct (e.g., activated through the
>   keyboard, voice, or mouse). We don't have a checkpoint about
>   this, although I did include prose in the 4 October version of
>   the spec (in the intro) distinguishing types of access.

I don't undestand serial? I think we have spatial mapping with pointing and
direct mapping without pointing. And both are important. It is important
not to be be forced to point because some users have great difficulties
with this. However, it is important to offer memory aids. A graphical UI
and just couple of interaction commands (pointing and clicking on an
object) can provide that. But ofcourse not every graphical UI is good,
there is a lot of design to do.

Marja

>So I agree with Charles: 
>
>  Point 1 seems to be necessary and insufficient.
>  Point 2 is only addressed in prose in the 4 October draft.
>
> - Ian
>
>-- 
>Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
>Tel/Fax:                     +1 212 684-1814
>Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783
>
Received on Tuesday, 5 October 1999 02:14:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:24 UTC