- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 18:54:48 -0400
- To: jon gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
- CC: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
jon gunderson wrote: > > Notes on checkpoints while reviewing IE: > Checkpoint 1.1 and 2.1 are almost identical for desktop graphical > browsers. We need to include examples of a KIosk orsome other > non-keyboard/mouse based user agent in 1.1 to show that it > is a much more general checkpoint that 2.1. I think the rationale text (of [0]) is sufficient. Or if it's not, is should be edited to be sufficient: <BLOCKQUOTE> Although keyboard access may seem to contradict the previous guideline on device-independence, ensuring keyboard access to user agent functionality is important to accessibility since keyboard access is available to many users and is widely supported. </BLOCKQUOTE> [0] http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/WAI-USERAGENT-19990809/ > Checkpoint 4.2. Is this related to toolbars or all controls? This may be > to broad of a checkpoint. I think it applies to all controls. Are all controls "active"? Maybe we can reduce the scope by talking about the ones the user interacts with. > Checkpoint 6.16 What does user interface components mean? I think this checkpoint should be dropped. See thread beginning at [1]. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/1999JulSep/0212.html > We also need to have more examples of what views are to make it clear to > developers. Anything that shows a view of content: a window, frame, panner, magnifying glass, etc. Other examples? - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel/Fax: +1 212 684-1814
Received on Friday, 27 August 1999 18:56:26 UTC