Re: 11.1 versus 11.2 - followup

So checkpoint 11.1 covers your PDF example as well as the accessibility
features of HTML, CSS, and all other W3C or non-W3C technologies. 

And checkpoint 11.2 covers the remaining features of HTML, CSS and other W3C
technologies that are not specifically for accessibility but may be helpful to
people with disabilities. 

I think the word "appropriate" in 11.2 may be confusing if accessibility
features of W3C technologies are covered under checkpoint 11.1

just checking,

kitch




At 10:31 AM 8/26/99 -0400, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>You can implement the accesibility features of HTML 4.0 without implementing
>the entire specification, or without. More to the point, while PDF is not a
>W3C Recommendation, a user agent which renders PDF documents should support
>all the accessibility features of PDF.
>
>Charles
>
>On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Kitch Barnicle wrote:
>
>  What is the difference between checkpoint 11.1 and 11.2, which are both
under
>  the guideline "User agents should support applicable W3C technologies
and in
>  particular the accessibility features defined for the technology."  
>  
>  
>  11.1 Implement the accessibility features defined for supported
technologies.
>  [Priority 1] 
>  
>   11.2 Support appropriate W3C Recommendations. [Priority 2] For instance,
for
>  document markup, support HTML and XML; for style sheets, support CSS; for
>  mathematics, support MathML; for multimedia, support SMIL, etc. 
>  
>  
>  Thanks,
>  Kitch 
>  
>
>--Charles McCathieNevile           
<mailto:charles@w3.org>mailto:charles@w3.org
>phone: +1 617 258 0992  
<http://www.w3.org/People/Charles>http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
>W3C Web Accessibility Initiative   
<http://www.w3.org/WAI>http://www.w3.org/WAI
>MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
>

Received on Thursday, 26 August 1999 10:43:00 UTC