W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > July to September 1999

Re: yes, no, n/a

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 13:03:44 -0400 (EDT)
To: thatch@us.ibm.com
cc: jon gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9908251302230.12722-100000@tux.w3.org>
Oh. I figured mostly meant no, but then provided some idea of how far away
you might be. I'll re-check my comments and try to make it clear. (this is
the problem with a table - I built all my data in one, which I can publish if
poeple are interested.

Charles McCN

On Wed, 25 Aug 1999 thatch@us.ibm.com wrote:

  
  
  For group members to understand the difficulties encountered by outsiders trying
  to determine compliance, please evaluate with "yes , no, n/a." Of course
  comments are good! Answers like "mostly" just not don't fly. If you want to
  write ? you know there is a problem with the checkpoint. "Not being a developer"
  is not relevant, because non-developers of products will be trying to make these
  evaluations.
  
  Jim Thatcher
  IBM Special Needs Systems
  www.ibm.com/sns
  thatch@us.ibm.com
  (512)838-0432
  
  

--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
Received on Wednesday, 25 August 1999 13:03:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:23 UTC