My opinion and at least in my estimate of the consensus within the working group for the last month is that we want to reflect user requirements which included non-visual renderings. What is your main objection to including information about non-visual renderings for user agents? Jon At 10:04 PM 1/12/99 -0800, Charles (Chuck) Oppermann wrote: ><< >The current charter has a broad scope in terms of what kind of User >Agent it considers, and although I think it's important we produce >guidelines for everybody, from voice agent to kiosque, I think it's >even more important that we do mainstream browser first. >>> > >Agreed. The problem that the WG needs to solve is with mainstream >*browsers* first, mainstream media players next and then investigate other >types of user agents. > >That's my opinion of course. >-Chuck > Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: 217-244-5870 Fax: 217-333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund http://www.als.uiuc.edu/InfoTechAccessReceived on Wednesday, 13 January 1999 11:03:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:48:48 GMT