- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 10:46:31 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@staff.uiuc.edu>
- cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
I think that both these checkpoints also apply to desktop graphical user agents. I think the priority of configuration is 2 And I think that the further explanation about the types of configuration can be happily left in the techniques. Charles On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Jon Gunderson wrote: Checkpoint proposal: Allow the user to configure the types of document changes they would like to be alerted too Priority: 1 or 2 Compatibility: Dependent user agents Potential configuration parameters: 1. Changes to text content in a document 2. Changes in position in a document 3. Changes in images in a document 4. Changes in color in a document 5. Changes in font face or style in a document 6. Changes in rendered text (changes in DISPLAY property of CSS) in document 7. Changes in form controls in the document 8. Changes in hidden information (probably not of any use though, since information is not normally rendered) in the document These items could be more roughly be broken down into the two categories defined by CMN in his initial mail on this issue: content and style B. Potential techniques/checkpoints related to informing the user about changes Checkpoint proposal: Inform the user of changes in the document due to scripting events Priority: 1 Compatibility: Dependent user agents Techniques: The user is informed of a change in the document and can access a list of document changes. Selecting an item from the list moves the users focus (point-of-reguard) to the changed information. The list is limited to the changes the user identified in the configuration section on document changes. The list would indicate the type of change that occured in the document, the element type that changed and some type of positional information about the element. The user would be able to return to the oringal focus before searching for the document changes at any time. C. Desktop Graphical User agents need to export information related to changes in the document This would be part of the section on compatibility. We already have a checkpoint for document change information being exported. Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: 217-244-5870 Fax: 217-333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund http://www.als.uiuc.edu/InfoTechAccess --Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +1 617 258 0992 http://www.w3.org/People/Charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI MIT/LCS - 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Received on Thursday, 10 June 1999 10:46:38 UTC