W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > October to December 1998

Re: A table navigation technique

From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@staff.uiuc.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 11:59:02 -0600
Message-Id: <199811171801.MAA24044@staff2.cso.uiuc.edu>
To: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
There needs to be consensus on issues.  Votes are helpful in determining
the current consensus (or lack of consensus) of the group, but may not be
good for final decisions.  I think we need to look at issues from a number
of different angles and not continue to rehash the same territory.  

I think the table linearization issue has been to narrowly defined for just
screen readers.  Please see other messages I have send today, I have tried
to offer a broader picture of the issue.  

At 08:44 AM 11/17/98 -0800, Scott Luebking wrote:
>Hi, Jon
>What is the process for deciding what items are assigned priority 1?
>Is there an online vote?  Is it resolved in the conference calls?
>The face-to-face?
>
>With regards to the table serialization, is it possible to do a
>"straw vote" to see where people are at?  If there is enough
>interest, I can write up about serialization of tables for the guidelines,
>but I would rather not use my time if the interest is lacking.
>
>Scott
> 
Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
1207 S. Oak Street
Champaign, IL 61820

Voice: 217-244-5870
Fax: 217-333-0248
E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu
WWW:	http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
	http://www.als.uiuc.edu/InfoTechAccess
Received on Tuesday, 17 November 1998 13:01:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:48:38 GMT