W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > October to December 1998

RE: A table navigation technique

From: Kathy Hewitt <kathyhe@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 11:17:26 -0800
Message-ID: <39ADCF833E74D111A2D700805F1951EF0799DB0C@RED-MSG-06>
To: "'Scott Luebking'" <phoenixl@netcom.com>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
I don't the see why that has to be a priority 1.  If a browser doesn't have
this option, does it make it inaccessible?

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Luebking [mailto:phoenixl@netcom.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 1998 1:30 PM
To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Subject: Re: A table navigation technique

I was wondering if there are any objections to the guidelines assigning
first priority level to visual browsers' providing the option of
tables being directly rendered by the browsers in serialized format
with the table cell identification approach?

Received on Monday, 16 November 1998 14:17:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:49:21 UTC