W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > October to December 1998

Re: SMIL: Authoring question

From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@staff.uiuc.edu>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1998 11:10:49 -0500
Message-Id: <199810081611.LAA11873@staff1.cso.uiuc.edu>
To: Denis Anson <danson@miseri.edu>, "Philipp Hoschka" <ph@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Actually I think the two document (one with the original video and sound,
and the second with the synchonized captioning information) format is
probably better, since it can be added later for an uncaptioned video and
it allows the captioning presentation to be controlled by the user through
the user agent.

Jon


At 10:17 AM 10/8/98 -0400, Denis Anson wrote:
>>With the current SMIL standard would the author need to create two versions
>>of their document, one with captions and the other without; or would the
>>captioning be an add on to the original document so the user just turns it
>>on or off?
>
>Regardless of what the current standard is, it ought to be a feature of a 
>single document that can be turned on and off.  If the standard makes it 
>difficult to do the task right, most developers will take the easy 
>route,and decide that captioning isn't *that* important.
>
>Denis
> 
Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
1207 S. Oak Street
Champaign, IL 61820

Voice: 217-244-5870
Fax: 217-333-0248
E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu
WWW:	http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
	http://www.als.uiuc.edu/InfoTechAccess
Received on Thursday, 8 October 1998 12:12:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:48:38 GMT