- From: Sean Murphy (seanmmur) <seanmmur@cisco.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 05:07:37 +0000
- To: Ramakrishnan Subramanian <ram.eict2013@gmail.com>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hello, It vilates 2.4.3 focus order. As the keyboard user cannot access the interactive element. Screen Reader navigation is technology specific. Sean Murphy SR ENGINEER.SOFTWARE ENGINEERING seanmmur@cisco.com Tel: +61 2 8446 7751 Cisco Systems, Inc. The Forum 201 Pacific Highway ST LEONARDS 2065 Australia cisco.com Think before you print. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/legal/terms-sale-software-license-agreement/company-registration-information.html -----Original Message----- From: Ramakrishnan Subramanian <ram.eict2013@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, 13 August 2018 12:48 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: 2.1.1 vs 2.4.3 Dear Members, I would like to get your opinion on the following scenario: If an interactive element misses the tab-order, which criteria does it violate? Example: A scripted button is not given (tabindex=”0”). Since a Keyboard only user cannot reach this with tab/shift tab key, does it violate (2.1.1)? or, since a Screen reader user can still reach it with quick navigation Key (B) and activate the Button, does it violate (2.4.3)? Thanks and regards, Ramakrishnan -- Thanks and Regards Ramakrishnan
Received on Monday, 13 August 2018 05:09:25 UTC