W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2018

Re: WCAG vialations or accessibility enhancements

From: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 14:30:56 -0500
Message-ID: <CAEy-OxG_2c8UJR+ULc18WKMWV9TQBSjto_LHQQERfCwAnWe=ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rakesh Paladugula <prakesh369@gmail.com>
Cc: Ramakrishnan Subramanian <ram.eict2013@gmail.com>, WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hello,

Phill Jenkins is correct concerning the headings. WCAG 2.0 does not
specifically require headings be nested.

And yes, this is the right place to post this kind of question on WCAG
conformance ....:-)

** katie **

*Katie Haritos-Shea*
*Principal ICT Accessibility Architect *

*WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA/QA/FinServ/FinTech/Privacy,* *IAAP CPACC+WAS = *
*CPWA* <http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/cpwacertificants>

*Cell: **703-371-5545 <703-371-5545>** |* *ryladog@gmail.com
<ryladog@gmail.com>* *| **Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/>*

People may forget exactly what it was that you said or did,
but people will never forget how you made them feel.......

Our scars remind us of where we have been........they do not have to
dictate where we are going.

On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 7:56 AM, Rakesh Paladugula <prakesh369@gmail.com>
wrote:

> My thoughts are :
>
> 1. Main heading can be a level 2. No harm in it. Having h5 after h2 is a
> violation as per 1.3.1 info & relationships.
> 2. I consider having improper text for labels as violation as per 2.4.6
> headings and labels. In your second container the label is Apple but the
> text is of banana.
> 3. I don’t think it is a violation.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Rakesh
>
> On 14-Feb-2018, at 11:41 AM, Ramakrishnan Subramanian <
> ram.eict2013@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Members,
> I hope it is appropriate to post this query here.
> I kindly request you to help me understand few of the accessibility
> related issues mentioned below.
> Whether these are treated as accessibility enhancement which would be
> helpful for the end user. Or accessibility violation.
> Heading order:
> Whether the following heading level is considered an accessibility
> violation? if yes, which criteria does this violate?
> The first heading level in the page is <h2> sample text </h2>
> The next heading level is <h5> sample text </h5>
>
> Landmark regions:
> When there are different content given inside two different aria
> region, with same aria label. Under which criteria this fails?
> <div role=”region” aria-label=”apple”>
> Apple related content goes here
> </div>
> <div role=”region” aria-label=”apple”>
> Bannana related content goes here
> </div>
> 3. Links which open in a new window:
> When there is no indication for the screen reader users for the link
> which opens in a new window, is that considered an accessibility
> violation? If yes, which criteria does this issue violate?
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Ramakrishnan
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2018 19:31:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 1 March 2018 19:31:24 UTC