W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2017

RE: Badly done hover

From: Balusani, Shirisha <sirib@uillinois.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 16:05:43 +0000
To: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>, "Michael A. Peters" <mpeters@domblogger.net>, w3c WAI List <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CC6721F1575C674B945171E5A7FA5DE4E128F9A8@chimbx4.ad.uillinois.edu>
The download button should available on the image all the time instead of showing it on hover.
Once the image is downloaded, it is little easier to read the content.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Avila [mailto:jon.avila@levelaccess.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 10:39 AM
To: Michael A. Peters <mpeters@domblogger.net>; w3c WAI List <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Badly done hover

> It made the page behind the hover have bigger text but the actual hover actually got smaller.

This is something I've seen a lot and have commented on as well.  Zooming in can make content get smaller as other regions of the page expand in fluid design.

The wheel of the mouse can be taken over so control+wheel no longer scrolls but does some other action.  While this can be worked around with the keyboard this seems problematic.


Jonathan Avila
Chief Accessibility Officer
Level Access, inc. (formerly SSB BART Group, inc.)
(703) 637-8957
Visit us online: Website | Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn | Blog Looking to boost your accessibility knowledge? Check out our free webinars!

The information contained in this transmission may be attorney privileged and/or confidential information intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael A. Peters [mailto:mpeters@domblogger.net]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 3:48 PM
To: w3c WAI List <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Subject: Badly done hover


Clicked on an image, rather than just presenting the image, it presented the image in a JS hover.

Text on image too small for me to read.

Ctrl+ is what I do in those cases.

It made the page behind the hover have bigger text but the actual hover actually got smaller.

Things like that should really be tested for. Text on bitmap graphics is often problematic anyway but making the image show in a hover that doesn't respond to standard Ctrl-+ as expected is really bad.

Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2017 16:06:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 25 July 2017 16:06:14 UTC