W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2016

Re: SVG 2 review request

From: Rich Morin <rdm@cfcl.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:14:20 -0700
Cc: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, Nikos Andronikos <Nikos.Andronikos@cisra.canon.com.au>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9EF03FEC-476B-4FD6-9B6C-FA5E5EA403B5@cfcl.com>
To: David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net>
> On Aug 11, 2016, at 21:33, David Dailey <ddailey@zoominternet.net> wrote:
> I think the Working Group’s willingness to consider interactivity in SVG
> inside HTML <img> ... as well as the ability to deform text (and glyphs)
> to shapes ... can also be cited as examples of progress ...

> In the world of HTML, whence come most of the web standards folk, one often
> thinks of words (and their meanings) as being the essence of accessibility.
> In the domain of geometry, where the semantics of position and change of
> position is "the meaning," the underlying issues ... *are* accessibility.


> [1] http://cs.sru.edu/~ddailey/svg/GeometricAccessibility.html

Unfortunately, several of the image links in this paper are broken.


http://www.cfcl.com/rdm           Rich Morin           rdm@cfcl.com
http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/resume    San Bruno, CA, USA   +1 650-873-7841

Software system design, development, and documentation
Received on Friday, 12 August 2016 07:14:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 12 August 2016 07:14:56 UTC