Re: Re[4]: Let's add an approved date field to Failures and Techniques

> "I didn't consider this, and certainly would not want to message that anything published before x date on a tech is or is not relevant. I see this suggestion more of a 'heads up' about how 'current' a tech may be - independently of whether it pertains or not to a given page."

Agree, and I think the suggestion was to apply the date, and then the various constituencies can decide what they do with it.

If that is to set dates where a technique / failure is valid for their laws, that’s fine, but it isn’t the W3C saying that is what should happen.

Cheers,

-Alastair