W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2014

RE: Opinions on accessible time formatting

From: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <coordina@sidar.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 19:37:13 +0100
To: "'Mattes, Kurt X1'" <Kurt.X1.Mattes@chase.com>, <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "'Andy Keyworth'" <akeyworth@tbase.com>, "'WAI Interest Group'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1a3501cffab9$da4da890$8ee8f9b0$@sidar.org>
I think that the most "accesible" is the international format: yyyy/mm/dd,
for example: 2014/11/07

This can be understood by any person in any language.

And for the hours the 24 hours format: 23:00

See the ISO 8601 "Data elements and interchange formats — Information
interchange — Representation of dates and times"

Regards,

Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
Patrono y Directora General
Fundación Sidar - Acceso Universal
Email: coordina@sidar.org
Personal: Emmanuelle@sidar.org
Web: http://sidar.org




-----Mensaje original-----
De: Mattes, Kurt X1 [mailto:Kurt.X1.Mattes@chase.com] 
Enviado el: viernes, 07 de noviembre de 2014 15:50
Para: chaals@yandex-team.ru; Andy Keyworth; 'WAI Interest Group'
Asunto: RE: Opinions on accessible time formatting

Agree with Chaals and only add that consistency in the way it is presented
is an important part of comprehending any information that is commonly
presented in various ways. 

Thanks,
Kurt Mattes 
VP - Electronic Communications Accessibility Team | JPMorgan Chase & Company


-----Original Message-----
From: chaals@yandex-team.ru [mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru] 
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 7:00 AM
To: Andy Keyworth; 'WAI Interest Group'
Subject: Re: Opinions on accessible time formatting

OK, I'll bite

04.11.2014, 16:12, "Andy Keyworth" <akeyworth@tbase.com>:
> Hi,
>
> I'm hoping I can get some advice on how expressions of time can be 
> accessibly formatted on web pages.
>
> For example, is 11:00 a.m. or 2:00 p.m. considered (generally) 
> acceptable, or would 11:00 am or 2:00 pm (without periods between 
> letters) be preferable? Is another format better?

As far as I know, these are pretty much equal in reality.

(Note that date formats are different. You do a lot better for most people
using DD Month YYYY, e.g. 12 November 2014 than any shorthand. But I doubt
that is news).

cheers

>
> Thank you,
>
> Andy Keyworth
> Senior Web Accessibility Specialist
> T-Base Communications
> Phone: 613-236-0866 | Toll free: 1-800-563-0668 x 1256 www.tbase.com | 
> Ogdensburg, NY | Ottawa, ON ALL TOUCH POINTS. ALL ACCESS METHODS. ALL 
> FORMATS.TM
>
> This email may contain information that is privileged and 
> confidential. If you have received this communication in error, please 
> delete this email message immediately.

--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com


This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained
herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.  Although
this transmission and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus
or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is
received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure
that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase &
Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage
arising in any way from its use.  If you received this transmission in
error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its
entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you.
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 18:37:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:53 UTC