- From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net>
- Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 17:23:42 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Darren McMillan <darren.mcmillan@dogdigital.com>
- cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Actually this may demonstrate the difference between a blog and real journalism. The suggestion that a company announced something prior to requesting a waver from having to provide that something does not hold together. After all, why *must* a person by a tablet if all they want to do is read? Is not that what such simple devices provide the public? A means to do something basic. I mean you can use a buzz saw to open a can too, but why if there is a simple can opener in the drawer? Karen On Wed, 7 Aug 2013, Darren McMillan wrote: > Hard to tell as the further you read into the petitions references, the less > convincing it becomes. That being said there is a pretty good write up > regarding its implications here: > > http://www.the-digital-reader.com/2013/08/07/debunked-amazon-kobo-and-sony-didnt-request-ereaders-be-exempt-from-accessibility-laws > > On 07/08/2013 14:14, James Carter wrote: >> Is this SPAM? >> >> *James Carter* >> Web Developer >> (540) 568-5606 (office), (540) 560-5478 (cell) >> carte3je@jmu.edu <mailto:carte3je@jmu.edu> >> >> James Madison University <http://www.jmu.edu/> >> >> >> >> Apply <http://www.jmu.edu/admissions/index.shtml> Connect >> <http://www.jmu.edu/connect/index.shtml> Give >> <http://www.jmu.edu/give/index.shtml> Twitter <http://twitter.com/jmu> >> Facebook <http://facebook.com/jamesmadisonuniversity> >> >> On Aug 7, 2013, at 7:51 AM, David Hilbert Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net >> <mailto:poehlman1@comcast.net>> wrote: >> >> > >> > http://www.blindbargains.com/bargains.php?m=9286 >> > >> > -- >> > Jonnie Appleseed >> > With His >> > Hands-On Technolog(eye)s >> > touching the internet >> > Reducing Technology's disabilities >> > One Byte At a time >> > >> > >> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2013 21:24:05 UTC