W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: ARIA role restrictictions in HTML5

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 15:34:20 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+ri+VnUS+9taVhjQ=7SoJpxfD1_uiFs_ObOiZ8XJAFoSsXsnQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Thanks to Jonathon.

The ARIA role restrictions on a few HTML5 elements were incorrect, this has
now been fixed in:http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/dom.html#sec-implicit-aria-semantics

on the larger question of what restrictions should be in place, I suggest
people file a bug [1] against the HTML specification raising any issues.
Note you need to set up an account for the W3C bugzilla to file bugs, but
this is a simple process.


[1]
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/enter_bug.cgi?product=HTML%20WG&component=HTML5%20spec&priority=P3

with regards

--
SteveF
HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
<http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html>


On 20 March 2013 14:25, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com> wrote:

> I was looking at the latest draft version of the HTML5 specification and
> noticed in the implicit aria semantics table it indicates that only a
> limited set of ARIA roles can be used with certain elements such as the
> anchor element to conform to the HTML5 specification.  Specifically you
> could not use a role of button, radio button, etc. on anchor elements.
> This seems problematic but makes good semantic sense.  One advantage of
> using anchors with hrefs for diverse ARIA roles is there is some
> progressive enhancement support.
>
>
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/dom.html#sec-implicit-aria-semantics
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 23 March 2013 15:35:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 23 March 2013 15:35:29 GMT