and maybe a lot of the shouting should be at microsoft which has intentionally sabatoged the "open document format" which is accessible and freely avaliable to all. except that MS has blocked it from the windows system by default. even documents produced by libre or open office on a windows computer and saved in open document format cannot often be read by the same machine if using word. and MS will not release any of it's code for access sharing among OS's (not that I would expect them to) but they shouldn't sabatoge the naturally occuring accessible formats that haven't paid windows licensing fees. Bob On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, [iso-8859-1] Olaf Drümmer wrote: > I simply believe the burden to make operating systems accessible should > be on the operating system, not only on some format for transporting > content. 5B> > Just envision some operating system decided not to support a certain technology or format any longer - is it then up to that technology or format to fix the operating system? One might think this can only happen to the likes of Flash, but what if someone decided HTML is not what they wish to support? Would all HTML become inaccessible because of this?
Received on Friday, 1 March 2013 15:45:31 UTC