- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 20:16:12 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 21/06/2013 16:30, deborah.kaplan@suberic.net wrote: > but I wonder what our > recommendation from an accessibility standpoint should be about > those pages which endlessly scroll using JavaScript, without > anchors to particular places in the page, or the ability to use > the back button to get back to where you were. Those likely already violate WCAG 2.0 in different ways, though off the top of my head I'm not 100% sure which particular SCs. At the very least, there should be a setting that disabled endless scroll and instead has a button to "Load more tweets" or whatever dynamically. P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ ______________________________________________________________ twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke ______________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 21 June 2013 19:16:49 UTC