Re: Current suggestion for subheading isn't accessible

>
> Although I don't want to get too philosophical here...what *is* a
> subheading, exactly? Is there any unambiguous definition?



that's part of the issue I also think we are twisting ourselves in knots
over an issue that is frankly less important than many of the other
accessibility issues we could spend time working on.

--

Regards

SteveF
HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>


On 8 May 2013 09:46, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote:

> On 08/05/2013 09:39, Steve Faulkner wrote:
>
>> Hi Olaf,
>> I think you have hit the nail on the head.
>>
>> I many cases, the parts of a title delineated as a subtitle are just
>> differences in visual style (also alluded to by Duff)
>>
>> We also appear to be forgetting the words themselves in the equation and
>> what information they convey.
>>
>> As for the use of punctuation, its seems that if they cannot be used as
>> a reliable indicator of meaning (as Ian suggests) then we are doomed.
>>
>
> Although I don't want to get too philosophical here...what *is* a
> subheading, exactly? Is there any unambiguous definition? Looking randomly
> at, say, http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/**subheading<http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/subheading>doesn't give me anything beyond suggesting that a construct like
>
> <h1>The Lord of the Rings</h1>
> <h2>The Two Towers</h2>
>
> may be as good a solution as any. *ducks*
>
> P
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
> ______________________________**______________________________**__
> re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
> [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
>
> www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
> http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/**redux/<http://flickr.com/photos/redux/>
> ______________________________**______________________________**__
> twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
> ______________________________**______________________________**__
>
>