W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

From: <accessys@smart.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:14:28 -0500 (EST)
To: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
cc: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.1212181613150.14937@cygnus.smart.net>

yeah that sort of half works but is only blocking images not all the rest 
of the "Stuff" that lynx does,  it helps but it just blocks it there is no 
"alt" or captions etc.


Bob


On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Loretta Guarino Reid wrote:

> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:00:17 -0800
> From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
> To: accessys@smart.net
> Cc: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> Subject: Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
> Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:00:48 +0000
> Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> 
> Try Edit > Preferences, then select the Content tab.
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:53 PM, <accessys@smart.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
>>
>>  On 18/12/2012 19:41, accessys@smart.net wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> no not really just via webmail.
>>>>
>>>
>>> In which case I'll hazard a guess that what you did there was not change
>>> the image loading preferences in Firefox, but in your webmail's site.
>>>
>>> FWIW, from memory, Firefox's image settings are in: Tools (or Options) >
>>> Content > Load images automatically (checkbox)
>>>
>>>
>> no such commands in most recent updated version of Firefox for linux
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 21:15:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 18 December 2012 21:15:10 GMT