- From: Perkins, Eric B. (VITA) <Eric.Perkins@vita.virginia.gov>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:04:56 +0000
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Please take me off your mailing list. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 4:03 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL] On 18/12/2012 20:58, accessys@smart.net wrote: > > no argument, just stating the obvious cool, so we agree then that JavaScript is an acceptable technology that can be used, if used properly, in light of WCAG 2.0...as that was the original question? P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ ______________________________________________________________ twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke ______________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 21:05:23 UTC