W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2012

RE: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

From: Perkins, Eric B. (VITA) <Eric.Perkins@vita.virginia.gov>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:04:56 +0000
To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <587B055EC4E7D247AD0AA76D97404DB6363CAC@COVMSGCES-MBX01>
Please take me off your mailing list. Thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick H. Lauke [mailto:redux@splintered.co.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 4:03 PM
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

On 18/12/2012 20:58, accessys@smart.net wrote:
> no argument, just stating the obvious

cool, so we agree then that JavaScript is an acceptable technology that can be used, if used properly, in light of WCAG 2.0...as that was the original question?

Patrick H. Lauke
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]

www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/

twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 21:05:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:47 UTC