W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

From: <accessys@smart.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:30:28 -0500 (EST)
To: Bruce Lawson <bruce@brucelawson.co.uk>
cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.1212181129010.8553@cygnus.smart.net>


Disability is prevelant in the rest of the world,. I discussed some of the 
things I saw in third world country independent living centers for/of 
people with disabilities....

so yes it is a disability issue.

Bob


On Tue, 18 Dec 2012, Bruce Lawson wrote:

> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:13:25 -0000
> From: Bruce Lawson <bruce@brucelawson.co.uk>
> To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> Subject: Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
> Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:13:59 +0000
> Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> 
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:00:22 -0000, <accessys@smart.net> wrote:
>
> there is still a major need for narrow bandwidth browsers
>> usability as this as I keep trying to remind folks is a
>> 
>> _WORLD_WIDE web, not just a web for those that have but also for those 
>> that barely have anything to connect with.
>
> Indeed. But that is not an accessibility  problem (in the w3c sense meaning 
> "access for people with disabilities).
>
> -- 
> bruce
>
> ✄--------------------------------
>
> Bruce Lawson
> @brucel
> www.brucelawson.co.uk
>
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 16:30:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 18 December 2012 16:30:59 GMT