W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?

From: Karl Groves <karl@karlgroves.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:13:43 -0500
Message-ID: <CABScKPCundh63SRVgqVtc1BPzOj0QBP1giA3fc2RqmooVKB1_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matt May <mattmay@adobe.com>
Cc: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
And so it is that twice in this thread, the honorable Mr May says exactly
what I was thinking. Is there a fee for this service?

Thank you for attempting to bring sense to a discussion which long ago
became nonsense


On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Matt May <mattmay@adobe.com> wrote:

> I think that if we’re to the point where we’re casting aspersions on a
> group of people based on the views they share, then we can safely say this
> thread is over. If you’d like to discuss the merits of scripting, by all
> means continue. But I submit that comparing the lengths of our proverbial
> beards is beyond the remit of the WAI-IG list. It’s distasteful, to say the
> least.
> -
> m
>  *From:* David Woolley
> *Sent:* ‎December‎ ‎17‎, ‎2012 ‎4‎:‎08‎ ‎PM
> *To:* 'wai-ig list'
> There are two different cultures on this mailing list.  The newer
> culture takes a narrow view of accessibility, that it is about allowing
> for those disabilities that are politically acceptable to business, and
> which can be solved by users spending money and learning to use tools.
> I suspect it is mainly composed of "accessibility consultants".
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 02:14:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:47 UTC