W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?

From: Ramón Corominas <listas@ramoncorominas.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 20:15:24 +0100
Message-ID: <50CF6F4C.6000909@ramoncorominas.com>
To: Harry Loots <harry.loots@ieee.org>
CC: accessys@smart.net, W3C WAI ig <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Harry quoted:

> "Following these guidelines will make content *accessible*
 > to a wider range of people with disabilities"

Accessibility = aim at people with disabilities

> "Following these guidelines will also often make your
 > Web content more *usable* to users in general."

Usability = aimad at everyone

Note also the difference between "will make" and "will often make". The 
second one means that usability may be a side effect of using WCAG 2.0, 
not its primary goal.

Received on Monday, 17 December 2012 19:15:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:47 UTC