W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 08:58:09 +0100
Message-ID: <50CC2D91.6040404@splintered.co.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 15/12/2012 03:28, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> I do agree, and I side with Harry's first point.
> you may use Javascript, but not without doing it in an accessible way,
> and not by declaring a technology baseline on a public service site.

But again, the idea of "baseline" used to be in an early version of WCAG 
2.0, but is now - from what I can see - now enshrined in that standard 
anymore, replaced by the concept of "accessibility supported". Just to 
avoid confusion.

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]

www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
______________________________________________________________
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
______________________________________________________________
Received on Saturday, 15 December 2012 07:58:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 15 December 2012 07:58:33 GMT