W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?

From: Harry Loots <harry.loots@ieee.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:45:39 +0100
Message-ID: <CA++-QFcZU7L6WQzOerRPBX_quvbuveT64U+s0bCAJun9yCyqvA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Cc: W3C WAI ig <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
On 14 December 2012 14:33, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote:

> In my view, it would be more akin to expecting every building to also
> provide a supply of wheelchairs, as some people may not have a wheelchair
> but need it. (same way people can use readily-available browsers that work
> well with properly coded JavaScript, and instead choose to use Lynx etc).
>
> Or, they could provide a ramp, and make it accessible :)

Kind regards, Harry
Received on Friday, 14 December 2012 13:46:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 14 December 2012 13:46:12 GMT