Re: is javascript considered good wacg 2.0 practice?

On 14 December 2012 14:33, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote:

> In my view, it would be more akin to expecting every building to also
> provide a supply of wheelchairs, as some people may not have a wheelchair
> but need it. (same way people can use readily-available browsers that work
> well with properly coded JavaScript, and instead choose to use Lynx etc).
>
> Or, they could provide a ramp, and make it accessible :)

Kind regards, Harry