W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2012

RE: changing presentation of links

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 12:45:05 -0800
To: "Foliot, John" <john.foliot@chase.com>, Roger Hudson <rhudson@usability.com.au>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EE43A638A0C5E34E80AF78EFE940FC2C01B6DFDEA7@nambx09.corp.adobe.com>
John,
I think that we are in agreement, am I being stingy in my assessment?

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe Systems

akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpatrick@adobe.com>
http://twitter.com/awkawk
http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility

From: Foliot, John [mailto:john.foliot@chase.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 3:34 PM
To: Andrew Kirkpatrick; Roger Hudson; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: RE: changing presentation of links

I don't think I would be as generous as Andrew here. I believe links should be perceivable to all users without first having to hunt for them (using tabbing or mousing), as I believe this is an important consideration for users with cognitive disabilities. To quote Steve Krugg, "Don't Make Me Think".

I wouldn't go so far as to insist on  links *always* being blue or *always* being underlined (I am happy with other strategies that meet the test), and I think there is some latitude in Navigation links in a list (commonly used for persistent navigation menus), but for other in-page links I believe that a visual indicator that does not rely on color alone is critical, and I personally would fail any example that did not meet that minimum bar.

My $.02 worth

JF

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick [mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 12:06 PM
To: Roger Hudson; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Subject: RE: changing presentation of links

I would say none.  Links are identifiable by being able to tab to them, or by the cursor changing appearance, as well as other ways that I'm probably forgetting.  There is an impact on usability, for sure, but I don't think that you'd fail 1.4.1.

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Group Product Manager, Accessibility
Adobe Systems

akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpatrick@adobe.com>
http://twitter.com/awkawk
http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility

From: Roger Hudson [mailto:rhudson@usability.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 2:58 PM
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Subject: changing presentation of links

Hi

Many developers now remove the underline from links, and some change the colour of links from the default blue. I know from my observations this can make the pages harder for some people to use.

I would be interested to know what impact other people think this might have on complying with this Success Criteria:
1.4.1 Use of Color: Color is not used as the only visual means of conveying information, indicating an action, prompting a response, or distinguishing a visual element.

Thanks
Roger



This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you.
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2012 20:45:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 8 November 2012 20:45:35 GMT