- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:17:52 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Ian Sharpe wrote: > > Does anyone know of a fully accessible CSS / JS bootstrap framework > similar to twitter bootstrap for example please? Or is twitter bootstrap > itself fully accessible? > I hadn't come across the term before, so I googled it. It doesn't appear to be generic term, but simply part of the name of the "twitter" product. If that is right, you need to provide a generic definition. Unfortunately, the Wikipedia article didn't enlighten me as to the defining characteristics. In particular, I couldn't find any description of how it constrained, or for that matter, abused, HTML. The Wikipedia example didn't appear to accessible, but I don't know if that is because it allows bad practice or forces it (I was looking at how it used label). <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_Bootstrap> I would suspect pages don't work well CPU load) on older PCs, but it is possible they degrade well when the scripting is disabled. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2012 23:18:29 UTC