W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Administrative interfaces

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 07:59:49 +0100
Message-ID: <504EE165.4040607@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Christian Biggins wrote:
> 
> I was wondering whether or not an administrative interface for a website 
> should also be compliant? 
> 
> Personally I would think it should, but clearly there is a fairly 
> weighty argument against the additional work, especially if you are 
> controlling who can and cannot access the interface. Granted if you hire 
> somebody who relies on the use of assistive technologies, you would need 
> to revisit, but would it be a requirement?
> 

Ultimately this is a question for legislators, but in my view it should 
be easy to produce A or AA compliance for such an administrative 
interface, because you do not have to worry about branding and making it 
visually pretty.

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2012 07:00:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:13:30 UTC