W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Administrative interfaces

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 07:59:49 +0100
Message-ID: <504EE165.4040607@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Christian Biggins wrote:
> I was wondering whether or not an administrative interface for a website 
> should also be compliant? 
> Personally I would think it should, but clearly there is a fairly 
> weighty argument against the additional work, especially if you are 
> controlling who can and cannot access the interface. Granted if you hire 
> somebody who relies on the use of assistive technologies, you would need 
> to revisit, but would it be a requirement?

Ultimately this is a question for legislators, but in my view it should 
be easy to produce A or AA compliance for such an administrative 
interface, because you do not have to worry about branding and making it 
visually pretty.

David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2012 07:00:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:45 UTC