- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 07:59:49 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Christian Biggins wrote: > > I was wondering whether or not an administrative interface for a website > should also be compliant? > > Personally I would think it should, but clearly there is a fairly > weighty argument against the additional work, especially if you are > controlling who can and cannot access the interface. Granted if you hire > somebody who relies on the use of assistive technologies, you would need > to revisit, but would it be a requirement? > Ultimately this is a question for legislators, but in my view it should be easy to produce A or AA compliance for such an administrative interface, because you do not have to worry about branding and making it visually pretty. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2012 07:00:22 UTC