W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Fwd: Re: UPDATE suggested alternatives to accessible version

From: <accessys@smart.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:39:56 -0500 (EST)
To: Marc Haunschild <mh@zadi.de>
cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.1202210937580.5131@cygnus.smart.net>

Amen,

my church rebuilt their website and after they were finished they asked me 
to check it.... weeeellllllllll  having to tell a friend that it was 
lousy took a LOT of tack,

Bob


On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Marc Haunschild wrote:

>>  The designers will try to justify their fees by claiming that that eye
>>  candy is what subtly influences visitors to the site to do what they
>>  owners of the site want them to do.  That's why it is so difficult to
>>  get people to design universal sites.
>
> Your sentence is not correct, it should say:
>
> Poor designers will try to justify their fees by claiming that that eye
> candy is what subtly influences visitors to the site to do what they
> owners of the site want them to do.
>
> And further: Good designers are rare. That's why it is so difficult to
> get people to design universal sites.
>
> Marc
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 14:40:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 21 February 2012 14:40:37 GMT