W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2012

RE: any suggested alternatives to accessible version

From: <accessys@smart.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:01:00 -0500 (EST)
To: Vivienne CONWAY <v.conway@ecu.edu.au>
cc: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>, Roger Hudson <rhudson@usability.com.au>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.60.1202170900340.26519@cygnus.smart.net>

could the "Click here" be found by a screen reader????

  Bob

On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Vivienne CONWAY wrote:

> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:52:21 +0800
> From: Vivienne CONWAY <v.conway@ecu.edu.au>
> To: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>,
>     Roger Hudson <rhudson@usability.com.au>
> Cc: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> Subject: RE: any suggested alternatives to accessible version
> Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:54:47 +0000
> Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> 
> Hi Roger and all
>
> I recently saw a website that said "if you are using a screen reader, please click here" and it then presented a more stream-lined website which had all of the functionality of the original site, however more resembled a site used with CSS off.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Vivienne L. Conway, B.IT(Hons), MACS CT
> PhD Candidate & Sessional Lecturer, Edith Cowan University, Perth, W.A.
> Director, Web Key IT Pty Ltd.
> v.conway@ecu.edu.au
> v.conway@webkeyit.com
> Mob: 0415 383 673
>
> This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify me immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message.
> ________________________________________
> From: David Woolley [forums@david-woolley.me.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, 16 February 2012 5:19 PM
> To: Roger Hudson
> Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> Subject: Re: any suggested alternatives to accessible version
>
> Roger Hudson wrote:
>
>>
>>  From previous research I know that many web users do not understand
>> what the term “accessible” means when it comes to web content. This
>> appears to be particularly the case with older users of the web.
>
> "easy to use"
>
> The real problem though is that web pages are advertising and in
> advertising you must not use anything that has negative implications
> about your product.  Saying that there is an easy to use version of the
> site implies that the main site is not easy to use (which while probably
> true, is not something that the designer would want to admit, even to
> themselves).  To be suitable for advertising copy, the words chosen must
> not suggest that there is anything wrong with the main site.
>
> "accessible" is a positive word, but sufficiently jargon that it doesn't
> signal anything to the general public whilst still allowing someone
> trained to use such pages to find it.
>
> --
> David Woolley
> Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
> RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
> that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
>
> This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or use the information contained within. If you have received it in error please return it to the sender via reply e-mail and delete any record of it from your system. The information contained within is not the opinion of Edith Cowan University in general and the University accepts no liability for the accuracy of the information provided.
>
> CRICOS IPC 00279B
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 14:02:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 17 February 2012 14:02:06 GMT