W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Using Heading to Replace Skip Links

From: leonor arango <leonor_lee@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 17:26:19 -0400
Message-ID: <COL107-DS11104074CEACBEDEF82DE2E91E0@phx.gbl>
To: "Jorge Fernandes" <jorge.f@netcabo.pt>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, <leonor_arango@yahoo.com>, "facebook" <team@facebook.com>, "Hotmail Team" <member_services@live.com>, "TrueTwit" <info@truetwit.com>
CC: "Sailesh Panchang" <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
looking at the old Hotmail still receiving, night mare. Sending I believe to 
me I hope, locked out twitter again. I have found in encrypted abt. 10 
licenses I to  sign 2 callmths ago. I have seen anything like in my life. 
Called FTC,  now they have Gov. We transferred, written, blocked I install 
next day gone.

What next I at lose am I registered?
Thanks God bless
w3c-wai

From: Jorge Fernandes o


Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 5:02 PM
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Cc: Sailesh Panchang
Subject: Re: Using Heading to Replace Skip Links

Hi,

I have been using WCAG 1.0 and implement it in a lot of sites since
1999. I'm also a screen reader user. I understand the need to mark
sections of a page with a heading, but what is a section in a
page? :-) Is any menu a section? Is a breadcrumb a section? To an
index engine, like Google, seems me that the headings are also (to me,
like user is) a noble element to be indexed. What it (the Google)
"think" about my waste of a noble element thousands of times repeated
in my website with the words "main menu"?!
When the WCAG 2.0 cames I read the note 2 of "Section Headings:
Understanding SC 2.4.10" of WCAG 2.0:

"Note 2: This success criterion covers sections within writing, not
user interface components. User Interface components are covered under
Success Criterion 4.1.2." 
http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/navigation-mechanisms-headings.html

I underline "...within writing ...not user interface". I interpret
this as "headings is to use in main content... and a menu, a
breadcrumb is interface, so don't use headings on it". And more: I
think this is a better solution to screen reader users - the user will
have more diversity of jumps and will know that headings are on the
main content.

Am I wrong in my interpretation more or less free?

Jorge Fernandes

++início do rodapé
 ⠨⠚⠕⠗⠛⠑ ⠨⠋⠑⠗⠝⠁⠝⠙⠑⠎ |
jorge.f@netcabo.pt
UniversalAccess.blogspot.com

On 16 May 2012, at 16:32, Sailesh Panchang wrote:

> Typically left nav or breadcrumb nav and sometimes
> even main content, though there might be other headings on the page.
> One may insert invisible headings to aid screen reader navigation ...
> this is exploiting the screen reader's heading navigation feature.
> This will not work for sighted keyboard users.
Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 21:26:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 18 May 2012 21:26:47 GMT