W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Null alt tags for decorative images - Technique H67

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 10:27:45 +0000
Message-ID: <4EB3BE21.2010609@splintered.co.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On 04/11/2011 09:31, David Woolley wrote:
> I don't think that you can ignore that. Images and styling allow
> messages to be put across that cannot honestly be put across in plain
> text, which means that the alt attribute for an image will often convey
> nothing like the real intent of the image.
>
> The images are often stock images and the represent the image that the
> company would like to put across and may bear no relation to the
> reality. Most modern PR material is about feeding back to the audience
> what they want to see, and images allow one to do that in a way that can
> be more economical with the truth than plain text, and that is why the
> examples of alt text end up being boring descriptions of the contents of
> the image, rather than the true message of the image.

So...what do you propose then?

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]

www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/
______________________________________________________________
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
______________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 4 November 2011 10:28:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 4 November 2011 10:28:36 GMT