- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 08:30:40 +0000
- To: G F Mueden <gfmueden@verizon.net>
- CC: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
David Woolley wrote: > G F Mueden wrote: >> This is one of five out of 24 emals that disabled my accessibility >> setting for choice of font Can't read it or what I am typing > > My best current guess is that his setting are character set dependent > and he hasn't set them for UTF-8. I've forced this back to ISO-8859-1, > as a test. It doesn't seem to be UTF-8. Next guess is that the AT cannot cope with quoted printable, which was triggered by the accented characters. Less likely, the accented characters put the AT into a different language mode. > > This would be a configuration problem with the assistive technology, as > UTF-8 will become more and more the standard for email. > -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Friday, 4 November 2011 08:31:22 UTC