W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: 1.4.1 clarification

From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:30:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEhSh3cNxQ7_4334CXWL_UdoJMCF_6DMu1p7P0NFGUhPpD5Mbw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gavin Thomas <Gavin.Thomas@uwe.ac.uk>
Cc: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
<bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Gavin Thomas <Gavin.Thomas@uwe.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Yes, but you still need sufficient techniques (whether your own or the working group) to meet the success criteria
>
> You need to meet the success criteria. Surprisingly, the fact that the
> WG wrote the success criteria does not mean that if you use them, you
> will pass the success criteria. You can (theoretically) "pass" every
> sufficient technique and still fail WCAG2.

Sorry, that was meant to read:

You need to meet the success criteria. Surprisingly, the fact that the
WG wrote the sufficient techniques does not mean that if you use them, you
will pass the success criteria. You can (theoretically) "pass" every
sufficient technique and still fail WCAG2.

--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Monday, 5 September 2011 15:31:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 5 September 2011 15:31:17 GMT