W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2011

RE: Examples of WCAG 2 implementations in national web guidelines?

From: Hanssens Bart <Bart.Hanssens@fedict.be>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 21:10:37 +0200
To: Peter Krantz <peter.krantz@gmail.com>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <314AD38167954C4BBE91263CA425506D145D816B68@MAIL2K7CL.yourict.net>
Peter,

indeed, they take a practical approach, translating WCAG 2 into a manageable
check list and adding some practical examples and own interpretations where
appropriate.

I don't think they translate each and every detail of WCAG2, but it seems to
be well received.

It's not an official label by the way, although many government agencies ask
them to audit websites.


Best regards,

Bart

PS: on a somewhat related note, you might be interested in the AEGIS and its
OAEG group, they have compiled a list of accessibility standards and guidelines

http://www.oaeg.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=506&Itemid=23

________________________________________
From: Peter Krantz [peter.krantz@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 3:32 PM
To: Hanssens Bart; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: Examples of WCAG 2 implementations in national web guidelines?

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 13:57, Hanssens Bart <Bart.Hanssens@fedict.be> wrote:
>
> Anysurfer labels are based upon WCAG / WCAG 2, but somewhat less abstract
> No English version available, so take a look at the NL / FR info pages

Thank you. Do I understand it correctly that Anysurfer partially
implements WCAG 2 with interpretation on some of the guidelines?

E.g. this guideline
http://www.anysurfer.org/acties-zijn-niet-strikt-tijdsgebonden
references WCAG 2.2.1 success criteria but has some other
requirements/interpretations as well.

Regards,

Peter
Received on Thursday, 31 March 2011 19:11:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:36 GMT