W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Examples of WCAG 2 implementations in national web guidelines?

From: Gautier Barrere <barrere@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:18:34 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTimSqz7ZFq-8wgLoT6b=fmjzgs=9XtLVf-LVgjUE@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chris Beer <chris@e-beer.net.au>
Cc: Peter Krantz <peter.krantz@gmail.com>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hi there,

In luxembourg we have ReNo (Référentiel de Normalisation). This is the
quality approach for gov luxembourgish websites.
We did 2 years ago a differential between WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0

Hope it'll help.

PS: by the way, Shawn (Henry), if you see that email, I'm still interested
in getting the W3C feedback :)

Best,

Gautier

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Chris Beer <chris@e-beer.net.au> wrote:

> Hi Peter
>
> You can find information on Australia's approach at
> http://www.finance.gov.au/publications/wcag-2-implementation/
>
> You can also email the Governments accessibility team at
> WCAG2@finance.gov.au
>
> Cheers
>
> Chris Beer
>
> On 31/03/2011, at 22:17, Peter Krantz <peter.krantz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > We are working on implementing WCAG 2 in our national web guidelines
> > for public sector websites. The guidelines encompass more than
> > accessibility (user centric development process requirements, minority
> > language law requirements, various technical stuff).
> >
> > I would be grateful for information on other national web guidelines
> > and how they have incorporated WCAG 2. As a portal requirement for a
> > specific level? Or did you implement a subset only (as indicated in [1])?
> >
> > Was it a successful approach?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Peter Krantz
> > Sweden
> >
> > [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/appendixA.html
> >
>
>


Received on Thursday, 31 March 2011 13:19:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:36 GMT