- From: Hanssens Bart <Bart.Hanssens@fedict.be>
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:57:40 +0200
- To: Peter Krantz <peter.krantz@gmail.com>, "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hello Peter, In Belgium we typically ask site builders to obtain the anysurfer.be (or equivalent) label, a spin-off of a non-profit/charity Anysurfer labels are based upon WCAG / WCAG 2, but somewhat less abstract No English version available, so take a look at the NL / FR info pages http://www.anysurfer.org/nl http://www.anysurfer.org/fr In addition, at the federal level we have http://webguide.fgov.be with some additional guidelines/best practices on branding, robots.txt etc Best regards Bart -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Peter Krantz Sent: donderdag 31 maart 2011 13:18 To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Examples of WCAG 2 implementations in national web guidelines? Hi! We are working on implementing WCAG 2 in our national web guidelines for public sector websites. The guidelines encompass more than accessibility (user centric development process requirements, minority language law requirements, various technical stuff). I would be grateful for information on other national web guidelines and how they have incorporated WCAG 2. As a portal requirement for a specific level? Or did you implement a subset only (as indicated in [1])? Was it a successful approach? Regards, Peter Krantz Sweden [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/appendixA.html
Received on Thursday, 31 March 2011 11:58:18 UTC