W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: w3.org site-wide markup review?

From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:01:59 +0000
Cc: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, site-comments@w3.org, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <4D8E915B-3708-45C9-9AB2-A4B1157B2850@btinternet.com>
To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Ian

what is the hold on an independent external audit?

an audit to assess whether and to what extent  W3C is meeting the  
goals it sets?

this was apparently under-discussion at the time.

regards

Jonathan

>> ). But
>> given the W3C's key role in producing the relevant specs and
>> guidelines, there's a good case for saying its own pages should be
>> subject to far higher standards of quality control than any other on
>> the Web. Best practices, leading by example and all that.
>>
>> A good way for dealing with this would be for the W3C to instigate an
>> independent review,
>
> Hi Danny,
>
> I appreciate any offer of tools to help us maintain pages that  
> people use, and where the tool ends up lowering our costs.
>
> This list is one way people raise awareness about page problems, and  
> I read the list and fix the ones that we are maintaining and can be  
> fixed.
>
> _ Ian
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 15:01:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:36 GMT