W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Size of a clickable area and the WCAG 2 guidelines

From: Richard Warren <richard@userite.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:03:30 -0000
Message-ID: <003601cab551$f3b56410$0302a8c0@richard>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Andrew & Jon,

Under the old guidleines (V1) there was just a level 3 guideline about
distinguising between links -

10.5   Until user agents render adjacent links distinctly, include no-link,
printable characters between adjacent links.

Otherwise there was nothing about a "minimum clickable area". I think that,
as Andrew suggests, it is a usability issue that affects all sighted users
that are able to use a mouse. This is one of those issues where a blind
user, or anyone who uses the keyboard for navigation, actually has an
advantage. <G>

Richard
Technical Manager
Userite
http://www.userite.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andrew Kirkpatrick" <akirkpat@adobe.com>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 12:28 PM
Subject: RE: Size of a clickable area and the WCAG 2 guidelines


Jon,
I don't believe that this is covered by WCAG 2.0 - I can't speak for the
working group but as a member of it I think that the question is how far
this issue is along the slippery slope between being an issue that
differentially affects people with disabilities and being a usability issue
that impacts users irrespective of disability.

I'm not sure of the answer to that, but it is surely not only affecting
people with disabilities, so that may have been the basis for it not being
included.

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick

Senior Product Manager, Accessibility

Adobe Systems

akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk
http://blogs.adobe.com/accessibility


On 2/23/10 5:28 PM, Jonathan Avila wrote:
> Perhaps I missed something but I cannot locate anything in WCAG 2
> requiring a minimum clickable area for clickable items such as links or
> a minimum amount of space between clickable items. These accessibility
> best practices seem like more than usability requirements for people
> with mobility impairments and surely should at least be level AAA
> guidelines. Can anyone point me to a mapping into WCAG 2 for these?
>
> Jonathan
>
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 13:03:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:33 GMT